More Comments

Is there life up there?

oh la la

What the fuck is this oscurantist nihilist shit then, eh? Youre not fuckin French, are ya!

Ignore because they want to.

All of the above! But here's the one we've known all along, finally admitted to by that pus-bag US Defence Secretary Rumsfeld, at the US Senate hearing last week: "The coalition did not act in Iraq because we had discovered dramatic new evidence of Iraq's pursuit of weapons of mass destruction. We acted because we saw the existing evidence in a new light - through the prism of our experience on 9/11."

There it is, plain and simple: REVENGE! but more importantly: because they fuckin CAN!

In the same way the Howard regime was warned of - but ignored - a guaranteed massacre by pro-Indonesian militia in the lead up to the UN sanctioned elections in East Timor; in the same way the Howard regime knew of - but failed to admit - that no refugee children had been deliberately tossed overboard; and in exactly the same way the Howard regime is now slipping and sliding its slimey way out of the current disclosure regarding ratbag Johnny's false claim re Iraq's non-existant nuclear weapons capacity. You have to wonder when people will finally wake up to the obvious fucken pattern here!

Australian's intellegence agency, the Office of National Assessment, says Australia's Foreign Minister Downer was told this - right to his face - just four months before the Bali bombing: In response to a question from Downer about possible targets, Bali, Riau and Singapore were assessed to be attractive targets for Jemaah Islamiah, which was identified as the primary regional terrorist threat. This judgement was not made on the basis of any specific intelligence, but was the result of analysis of terrorists' probable capabilities and likely intentions. International hotels, nightclubs and airlines/airports were assessed as being high on terrorists' target lists. Despite this very specific assessment, at no time during the next four months did the Government's travel advisories, written by Downer's department and unseen by ASIO or onA, give any hint to Australian tourists that reflected onA's assessment. Not a word. Not a hint. On October 12, 202 people, including 88 Australians, died in the very place onA had assessed this could happen. The Australian Government ignored the assessment.

US polls indicate that for most Americans the attacks of September 11th justify all of the killing that has taken place in Iraq.

Americans believe - quite falsely - that Iraq was responsible for those attacks, and the human slaughter is seen as vengeance.

No connection between the government of Saddam Hussein and the attacks of September 11th has even been presented by either US or British government sources.

Americans accept their leadership's blatant lies due to a combination of sheer ignorance and a desire for revenge.

Of course I aint I...

the ultimate liberation is complete cremation of your entire nation blast it to damnation end the degeneration of ancient matrons let the ghosts go free and you and me

You ain't nothing but a hack living out the back of your momma's home too scared to roam or go out on your own think you scare me? you pathetic flea go wipe your arse before I have to pass my holy yellow juice on your fuckme fuckme boots

self destruct; it would be better for everyone

They're fuckin liars, plain and simple. That's it.

British PM Tony Blair the other day defended his fudging of facts by claiming the invasion of Iraq is justified despite the lack of finding any WOMD because Saddam Hussein's was an "appalling regime the world is well rid of".

Appalling sure, but was/is he unique in the world? I think not.

Putting aside the (critical!) issue that the US, British AND Australian governments' loud and concerted mantra prior to the invasion was Hussein's imminent threat, that he HAD to be attacked IMMEDIATELY to prevent him from using the WOMD that he very definitely HAD, there and then.

Now, the song has changed. Now, it seems is was all about granting ordinary Iraqis their freedom from Saddam Hussein.

Does the end always justify the means? Does anyone care that we have been lied to by our leaders on this incredibly vital issue? Did YOUR son die in Iraq, fighting for something in his head or for the false reasons our leaders kept banging on about? Is the world made "safer" by this barge-arsing about by the USA?

Is this the longest comment posted on Xenox News?!

And is there another "appalling regime" out there that was/is worse than that of Saddam Hussein?

Not North Korea, of course, because they actually seem to have the capacity to defend themselves (In fact, the reason they're restarted their nuclear arms program is as a direct result of the unilateral US invasion of Iraq!)

From big things little acorns grow!

But yes, for the sake of global peace and security, ALL religious fanatics should be locked up in loony bins, IMMEDIATELY!

It get's worse: BUSH TELLS PALESTINIAN PM GOD MADE HIM ATTACK IRAQ... "God told me to strike at al Qaida and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East. If you help me I will act, and if not, the elections will come and I will have to focus on them." --Ha'aretz, 06.25.03 For more background, go to http://www.bushwatch.net/bush.htm

FACT: We all get cash from chaos

No initiative!

Unsavory, obscure, illiterate, and yet... strangely compelling!

As we puzzle over this astonishing poll, we should remind ourselves that there are Americans out there who believe Elvis is still alive.

Our troops may well have fought for freedom, but that's not what John Howard sent them overseas for. The American invasion of Iraq was an evil act that deposed an evil tyrant, but - Saddam Hussein's demise was a peripheral outcome, not the central aim. We are all diminished by these things... god help us.

Poetry should be like a diamond bullet right between the eyes.

Aussie Rules sets a very poor example to our young people. However, it is just another sign of the times. Given the "example" provided by our nasty little Prime Minister...

1) All children are "had', but many wise up eventually.

2) Anything is permissable with dwarves, as long as the dwarves are consenting.

3) Was that dinner cloth on your dinner table; alrighty then! If it was someone else's" you're a very naughty boy!

4) I watch young boys' asses, so...

5) Did you cook? Then relax and have another cognac and a cigar. You didn't cook? Put on that apron and get in the kitchen , bub!

Bingo! Yep that's the heart of it. Who in their right mind would want their son to grow up to be like these clowns? All of them should do community service for their rest of their lives.

I agree! This is a controversial issue! The AFL should stop pretending these guys are role models for today's youth. They are nothing but gangsters and hooligans with no moral fibre at all!

C'mon this is controversial! Given a chance I would say that any team in the league would be have the same way.

I'm glad you agree with my observations Tex. You don't refute them at all. Why bother unplugging Frawley if it won't make a difference then? Lets unplug the Lions coach box and see how well they do. You're other comments are irrelevant and indicate that you can't think of an argument in reply.

As if having Frawley on the phone to his players would have made any difference!
Since when did you give a shit about the footy anyway Yugo?

ps we love Acker cause he is sooooo goood!

whats ther to summit over?

Here's another one. XN summit 1 occurred at my house. XN Summit 2 occurred at Max's house. Now Tex is refusing to have XN summit 3 at his house. Is that ethical?

Yeh! Thats the sort of inspiring stuff we're looking for!

Sorry sorry I should have followed the strict form of a limerick I met a young man from Kabul He was tall and hung like a mule He put down his gun And showed me his bum And said "I think that George Bush is a fool!"

I saw a young man in Kabul He was tall and hung like a mule He put down his gun and showed me his bum and said "I think that George Bush is a fool!" How's that for art? I made it up myself.

Too bad the Suckhole of Steel didn't bother acting upon warnings by Australia's own intelligence services that Bali was a prime target for Islamist terrorist attack!

I should have mentioned that this poll was conducted by the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland, USA.

An ealier poll taken by the Pew Center in 2002 showed that 66 percent of Americans believed that Hussein and bin Laden were both behind the Saudi "Sept 11" attacks.

That's right: SAUDI!

But you sure are TALKING a lot of CRAP!

Good to see the Yanks are being liberated in Iraq now. Liberated from living!
Now if only the tinfoil man could go over and join them...

I'm still limping and the fuckin stain won't come off the couch. The cat won't come down off the roof and the neighbours want a repeat performance. Who fell off the balcony and, more importantly, has anybody seen my skull cap?

It's a dirty job but someone's got to do it. What's your alternative?

Patriot, dear lad (lassy?) a pathetic and hissy response, typical of the cross-eyed, slack-jawed rabid right! But hey, let's not hit each other with sticks and broken bottles, lets TALK! What do you make of this, Patriot, and please don't be trite:

Since the U.S. destroyed the Taliban regime, Afghanistan - you do recall Afghanistan?! - is once more the world’s top producer of opium. The nasty Taliban HAD banned all poppy production under their strict religious rule, cutting off the Northern Alliance warlords from their narcotics production. But now, thanks to the Yanks, the drug barons — the very same Northern Alliance lads who were US allies in the ‘war on terror’ — are back in business again.

Some memorial to the thousands who died in the plane crash attacks on 11/09/2001!

Please, Patriot, tell me how you feel about that? Enlighten us with your inane, one-eyed, flag-waving gibberish.

Listen you lefty lunatics we've only been in Iraq for a few months and Saddass had at least 6 months to hide all his weapons before we liberated his people. It will take time but you can guarantee that the leaders of the free world Pres Bush and PM Blair will stop at nothing to find and destroy these evil weapons! Don't forget that by changing his evil regime we have freed millions of Iraqi's and enabled the road map to peace to be started between the Israelis and Palestinians, if we listened to you lot Saddam would still be torturing his people! Patriot Thats right I'm back and I'm taking no crap!

You forgot to mention GODS CHOSEN: the jews! But YES! Religion isn't simply the "opiate of the masses", its a plague, a disease, a curse on mankind's potential for good and greatness. Instead, we keep getting dragged down in spirals of endless senseless conflict. And for what? Bizarre superstitious bullshit, without foundation, fact or sense!

The real conundrum is the fact that the idiot who posted this and then amended the text after the first few comments can't even spell initiatee even when it's spelled for him. Ever heard of cut and paste moron?!?!

Be a man not a mouse;
Pull ya dick it's fucking grouse!

That's better. But I think its more a question of whether it suits your ethics if you are going to be doing the shredding and burning. I would be the victim I guess and as such you would acting against my will. Is inflicting physical damage to male genitalia a predilection of yours? A fetish perhaps? Something to do on the weekends? Personally I decline to engage in such activities.

Here is an ethical conundrum for you then:
Should you get your limp dick burned or shredded!??!
Suit your ethics???? As for osmosis...I'll pencil it up ya epiglottis!@

Ummm it's not really an ethical conundrum though is it? And an ethical conundrum would be relative to whatever ethics one believes in or that one has adopted via osmosis by virtue of one's place of birth. From the looks of the content on this website it appears that the contributors don't have any ethics other than bitching and whining about things they can't control. Which is kind of idiotic.

The initiator is initiated so they could be the same person. Perhaps you could rephrase? Perhaps you mean the initiatee? I think the initiatee should come first. After all it is their first sexual experience and the intitiator should control themselves and make sure that they have a great first time. After the initiatee has had one or two orgasms then the initiator can get their rocks off if they want to. Although it must be noted that watching someone orgasm for the first time can be alarming to an initiatee. It can appear as if the initiator has lost control or is having some kind of spastic fit or seizure.

Unless Labor abandons its pathetic attempts to emulate the Arselicker from Australia, they may as well go drown themselves in the Timor Sea.
VOTE GREEN!

You took the words right out of my fucken mouth!