Note - You can't post comments about this list of comments. That would be one level too far gone. Click a comment above if you want to reply.
Note - You can't post comments about this list of comments. That would be one level too far gone. Click a comment above if you want to reply.
Be the first to comment.
That's why Howard has my vote.
On another matter when is that lazy arse editor going to post up those questions????
"Do you really think so, Doctor?" she asked. The doctor held a tongue depressor in front of her face and said, "Of course. Now just open your mouth and say moo."
Israel and Australia.
Thats how far up the yanks arse our 70 year old PM has crawled.
I stopped listening after Swordfishtrombone, you could tell he was too straight from then on.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/magazine/story/0,,1932046,00.html
- Sultan of Onan
*CAPTAIN AUSTRALIA*
Thank you for declaring war on terrorism. I agree that fighting terrorism is very important. After all, no one really wants terrorists disrupting little league games and trips to the grocery store. I'm sure you've made great progress in making the world a safer place for all of us. And I'm sure each American would really like to help and do our part. There are a few things, however, that I am unclear about. Perhaps you can clarify them for me.
During hurricane Katrina, there were lots of looters stealing TV's and food from local stores. The looters were carrying guns. Are the looters terrorists, or were the police who shot at them terrorists? How come the war on terrorism does not extent to looters?
Whenever there is a blackout in a major city, people break windows and steal merchandise from stores, and commit crimes. I am not an expert, but these people seem to be causing terror. Why don't we just shoot them, like we shoot terrorists in the Middle East?
There is a bully in my neighborhood. He terrorises other kids. Is he a terrorist-in-training or the real thing? Should I call the police and ask them to shoot him? It seems shooting him would be a pre-emptive action.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad threatened to destroy Israel. Does that make him a terrorist? Or does he have to attack some country fiirst before he is classified as a terrorist? Personally, I think he would fall under the category of a virgin terrorist, because he hasn't done anything yet. Perhaps you should just shoot him anyway. Then Ahmadinejad can have 72 virgins in his next life, and Irael would be saved. Sounds like a win-win situation for everyone involved.
Mr. Kim in North Korea seems to like to torture his own people. I think that makes him a terrorist, but I could be wrong. Maybe he is just evil, since you said he is part of the axis of evil. If he tortured Middle Eastern terrorists, would that make him a terrorist? Or would it make him our friend?
They say China is one of the biggest violators of Human Rights. Does that make the Chinese government terrorists, even though they are terrorizing their own people? Why do we give a "Most Favored Nation" status to one terrorist country, and bomb another? Is it because they don't export their terrorism? Or are you afraid the Chinese will bomb us back? You know, the Chinese have nuclear weapons too. And there are more Chinese than Americans, so they're probably not scared of us.
Mr. Bush, you once called Democracy "Terror's Antidote". The democratic process was used in Palestine. Hammas won, making a brand new Democracy, That makes them Terror's Antidote. Then you refused to negotiate with them. I don't understand. They were elected with the democratic process, just like you wanted. Please explain.
I remember when a war was declared on crime. We still have crime, so I guess that war was lost. Then there was the war on poverty. And the war on drugs. Are these wars still going on? I don't think any of them have been won yet, but I could be wrong. Now we have a war on terrorism. There seems to be a pattern here, mostly like a pattern of never ending and never winning. Don't ya think?
I have a Samurai sword, Nunchucks, knives, and some throwing stars, but I do not have a gun. If someone breaks into my house, which one should I use to kill them? I can kill them pretty effectively with any of the weapons, but I think using the Samurai sword and knives might make me a terrorist, but not the Nunchucks. I'd hate to be classified as a terrorist. Which one should I use? Please keep in mind that I don't want too much blood all over my house.
Thank you very much for helping me understand these things. I am sure you have great insight into these matters. I am looking forward to your answers.
Dr. R.E. Zee.
- Paranoid Raving Right-wing Ratbag on an odd mix of drugs I just got from Johnno down at the pub...
Let's look at PATH link next!
- P. Dantic
- Vlad (we never have any callbacks or complaints!)
Flights of mad fancy like yours, always give us a lot of laughs!
- RCHQ (Motto: "I will have reality, or you can go and get fucked!")
Guess what?
It aint gunna happen!
Global warming-shcwarming; I'm proud to be a global warming sceptic.
Its a great aussie trait.
So forget it Mr Chato, life in our great land will continue on it's upward trend. Especially if you put the team with experience back again this year!
Digger
Cranbourne
- Big Spender
1. Thou shall not sneak out when parents are sleeping.
(why wait that long)
2. Thou shall not do drugs.
(alcohol lasts longer, not to mention being cheaper.)
3. Thou shall not steal from K-Mart.
(Wal-Mart has a bigger selection)
4. Thou shall not be arrested for vandalism.
(destruction has a bigger effect, I can tell you all about this)
5. Thou shall not steal from your parents.
(everyone knows grandma has more money)
6. Thou shall not get into fights.
(Cat fight anyhow...just start them.)
7. Thou shall not skip class.
(just take the whole day off)
8. Thou shall not wear revealing clothes in class.
(Hooters pays more)
9. Thou shall not think about having sex.
(like Nike says, "just do it")
10. Thou shall not help old ladies across the street.
(just leave 'em in the middle)
Howard is also very concerned for the welfare of the people of Iraq and ensuing chaos of a withdrawal.
I propose he also opens the gates and allows 20,000 - 30,000 Iraqis into Australia so they can enjoy the freedom and liberation we are so insistent upon bringing them.
Them Baghdad babies burn at night, they also burn all day...hey!
- J.W.Howdywar (keeping you little voters all cosy and safe)
While you are busy concentrating on fonding brains, your lawyer-leaches will be sucking the blood out right through your skin. And, if you look real close, these leaches have tiny little blood-red smiles that which they wipe with your dollar bills.
No wonder little John is so popular with the Oz public. He's got my arse-sucking vote!
- Brainless Victim of the hypnotic TV screen[:-)
When the terrorist rationale becomes passe a new enemy will be constructed and Ricardovitz will jump on the redneck high horse bandwagon.
Eventually, like all empires, they will run out of cash and go into serious decline and we will have a new dominant nation.
Then the rednecks will have to hide in their dens and play with there guns while some other nations tyrant leader will be calling the shots internationally and causing wholesale slaughter for the good of everyone.
Whoops! Those bastards have taken them away from us.
‘When a society believes in nothing, the only agenda is fear’
The United States has created yet another mythical enemy for everyone to fear, and to get all the dickhead rednecks onside, throwing there fists in the air and yelling 'nuke em all!'.
Dickhead rednecks make up a massive proportion of the population (according to the last census, 77%) and to alienate them through level-headed deplomacy would be detrimental to their election chances.
So then I am warming to your idea....not agreeing with you......just warming to it.
And, yes, the Muslims drew first blood agaisnt American Civilians on 911. They actually drew blood when they bombed our marines in Saudi Araba, in Lebanon, against Christians in Africa and all Middle Easter countries, when they attacked the WTC in the 1990's, with Anthrax, when they flew a prop-plane into a building in Tampa Florida, when they set off bombs in England, every time they attack an Israeli, when they bombed Bali, when they attacked Christians in Chechnya...
The damned list goes on and on and on. Muslims drew first blood and they must be destroyed. All of them.
If I saw an American man in real life, say, on the street or in a pub, I would be so scared that I think I would I would prefer to just keep my distance from them and not say anything that might make them angry. ...thank you very much, sir.
What makes it worse is - they all want to kill people in the name of THEIR God...they think this is OK. Well, then it stands to reason that if this is OK, then it's OK for ALL people of ALL religions to do it - isn't it?.......so where's the problem???
It' don't take too much input and discussion to know that two men aught not be alowed to marry each other.
It don't take too much reconing to figure out that government takes too much of a person's hard earned money away to redistribute to lazy, good for nothing, bums.
It don't take too much thought to figure out that Muslims hate Christians and Jews, always have, always will, and the best thing for our survival is eliminating Muslims.
It dont' take all that much brain power to understand that the ACLU is anti-American, that homosexuals want normal people to embrace their sexual perversions, that CAIR is a terrorist organization, and that Australia is made up of a large minority of limp-wristed, drug-guzzling lemmings, excluding Sir. Howard and his followers.
It dont' take too much cipher'n to figure out that if you take away guns and ammo from citizens that it's easy for dictators to control and eventually enslave them.
I personally believe these things - didn't have to consult with whores, pimps, homosexuals, rabbit-humpers, dope-peddlers, kiddie-diddlers, or Muslims to figure these things out.