MEETING SHARON'S OILY NEEDS

Blood for oil? Oil for blood? Hmm...

One of Israel's biggest oil firms has scored a multi-million dollar tender - courtesy of a subsidiary of the infamous Cheny's infamous Halliburton - to supply fuel to US troops in Iraq.

Recall: Israel produces almost no oil and imports nearly all its oil needs, mostly from former Soviet states.

You'll love this: Information from the US Department of Energy suggests that in April 2003 plans were raised for the "reopening" an old oil pipeline from a neighbour.

Which neighbour? Hazard a bloody guess, mate!

Back in the 1930s an oil pipe was built running from Mosul in Northern Iraq to the Israeli port of Haifa on its northern Mediterranean coast.

At its peak, the line carried 100,000 barrels a day, but was shut off in 1948, when Israel was "established"..

James Akins, a former US ambassador to the region (quoted in Brit rag The Observer): "It just goes to show that it is all about oil, for the United States and its ally.''

Now, bearing that in mind, let's have another look at some more rather interesting numbers, shall we?

US and 'Coalition' personnel deaths in Iraq: 649

US (only) wounded (i.e. maimed, disfigured, etc): 3120

US deaths since July 2nd when that nutcase Bush proclaimed "Bring 'em on!": 343

And now for another figure, the one the Bush League reckons isn't worth keeping tabs on:

Reported Iraqi civilians deaths: more than 10,000.

As for civilians injuried? By now that must be a pretty impressive number too!

And the November poll is looming over Washinton like Bush's very own Sword of Damocles.

Boy, I reckon capturing Osama Bin Someplaceor other would be mighty convenient for the Bush League about now (Not to mention the corrupt Musheriff of Pakistan)!

Keep up the good work Xenox News! The truth is not just out there, it's right here!

- Dusty Davo from Derrimut
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 22 years ago
    Surely anyone that can justify the deaths of innocent men, women and children as a means to an end is a "terrorist" . That definition fits both Sharon and Arafat. It definitely fits Saddam Hussein and the totally unrelated Osama Bin Laden. Unfortunately for all of us in the enlightened "West" it also fits George W Bush and Tony Blair (and their pipsqueak partner-in-warcrime John W Howard). I leave it to others to add to the list. It's sure to be a long and ghastly one. May they all burn in hell!
    ANGRY DOG
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 22 years ago
    Shh! Not so loud, or they'll label you an anti-semite!
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 22 years ago
    Is it true that the Talmud teaches that only Jews are human beings, that non-Jews were put on this earth only to serve Jews, and that anyone who opposes the Jews deserves to be killed?
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 22 years ago
    yeh, and the Koran says all non-moslems should be killed, the bible says all people who dont see Pope Mel's film should be killed, and Buddha said non-buddhists should be farted on daily.

    Whereas our God Nietzche says I am king!
    So now lick my balls infidel!

    Lordy Lordy Lordy
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 22 years ago
    How can a country claim to be democratic if it is made up of one religion. Why should the jews have their own state?
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 22 years ago
    Looks like Sharon will go down for bribery and corruption rather than mass murder. The fat bastard will get off lightly!
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 20 years ago
    Sharon has different "needs" now!
Write comments...
symbols left.
or post as a guest

Latest News

The Year That Is 2026

From The Archives