Feral Texas Chimp Shits on Table - Aussie Mini Me Licks It Up

DIPLOMACY IS DEAD: TERRORISM LIVES!
ROGUE STATES DEFY U.N., GLOBAL OPINION & THE TEACHINGS OF OUR SAVIOUR JESUS H. CHRIST JR.

As expected, the US charade of "cooperating" with the United Nations - the only global authority able to provide a legal basis for military action between nations - is over.

The United Snakes of America has abandoned the internationally accepted rule of law and has openly declared itself an outlaw: a rogue state.

And Saddass has 48 hours to get out of town.

Picture Preview

The ludicrous, juvenile references to Kaiser George Enron Bush's Hollywood cowboy delusions are endless. And terrifying. The lethal consequences will echo through history.

When the US policy of bullying, bribery and bullshit failed to intimidate members of the Security Council that war on the brutal Iraqi dick-tator Saddass Hussein was justifiable, the Yanks smirked knowingly and walked off in a huff (or was that a minute and a huff?) and did what they had always planned to do anyway.

Picture Preview


The world knows that the UN option was only ever a sideshow as far as the current US maladministraion is concerned.


The long expected and planned invasion of Iraq is on, and Aussies have been served up as cannon fodder by our duplicitious parrot of a PM. The so-called Coalition of the Willing has never looked more isolated, iniquitous, and morally threadbare.

More like the Coalition of the WILTING, judging by the domestic spasms of Brit poodle Tony Blah.

Lisping from the heavy duty use of his tongue on the tighly puckered rectum of the certifiable US Presidunce George Enron Bush, Monstralia's slippery Prime Miniature Jerk Howard today lived up to his deceitful reputation, as did his mad Yank mentor.

The PM confirmed this morning that he had received his final instructions from the Washingtoon Goon: Monstralia is riding the coat-tails of the United Snakes of America, going in for the kill in Iraq. Absolutley nobody was surprised. The mendacious Mini Mini Jerk has been taking his cue from Washingtoon all along.

Picture Preview


After 12 years of lethal economic sanctions and US bombing raids in "no-fly zones", smart bombs and dumb politicans will now decide the fate of the long-suffering citizens of Iraq.

The US ignored the use of Iraqi chemical weaponry during the Iran/Iraq war but sickeningly used this issue as part of its justification for invading Iraq. The US refuses to ratify or particpate in the International Criminal Court but has the gall to threaten Iraqis defending themselves against the US invasion with war crime prosecution. Fuuuuuuuuuck!!!

US hypocrisy is staggering.

The Terrorist blowback is incalculable.

The continuing attempts of the Bush clique to link secular Saddass to the 11 September 2001 atrocities committed by Osama bin Laden's religious fanatics is offensive and an insult to the victims of that horrific act.

Picture Preview


We may be shutting down Saddass Hussein's cruel regime but we are opening up a Pandora's Box of go-it-alone rogue states. If its good for the US goose, its good for the (fill in the gap) gander. Anything goes.

Asked for details of Monstralian military involvement, the slippery, beady-eyed Moz PM forsook his usual excuse of the "hyperthetical" and now claimed he could not discuss "operational" matters... well. true to form, "Honest" John: never give the punters a fact they might be able to use against you.

Too bad for the PM, the current sick farce is so blatantly obvious that he - like the blundering Brit Tony Blah - has sealed his own fate. History will make mincemeat of these patsies to elite US interests.

Pity the poor Iraqis, caught between the murderous, self-serving tyrant Hussein and the ignorant, self-serving tyrant Bush. If Saddass has any of these so-called WOMD snuck away in some desert tent somewhere, he sure as hell will use them now!


Which begs the question: why - if the mad old Butcher of Bagdad has "chemical and biological" weapons of mass destruction, WHY didn't he use them during his attack on Kuwait in the 80's? Why didn't he use them to defend his troops against the (UN-sanctioned) defence of the government of the unelected, non-democratic Kuwaiti kingdom? Why?

Because he knew the retaliation would be so devastating he would lose not one but ALL of his lavish palaces. In other words, he knew the use of such weapons would be the end of HIM.

Now, the US has been unequivocal in its wild, foaming-at-the-mouth war rhetoric. It has repeatedly stated it will put and end to Saddass - personally!

Picture Preview


Forget the juvenile "48 hours" threat to Saddass to leave Iraq. That's a Washintoon cartoon statement. Saddass knows he is looking down a gun barrel...

Use 'em or lose 'em, Saddass!


Still, in neither Howard's nor Bush's admissions of war was any proof of an imminent Iraqi threat to anyone outside Iraq provided. Chronic liars that both "leaders" are, they simply ask to be trusted... Never ever, Woomera Johhny and Enron George!

We are now outside the law. We are in the same boat as lunatics like Osama Bin There Done That.

We are fucked.

The most sickening aspect of the coming bloodshed will be its fundamental cause: the invasion fo Iraq occured because while the weapons inspectors carried out the will of the UN in Iraq, the dim-bulb Presidunce of the United States of Amnesia "ran out of patience".

Just cause for mass mayhem, maiming, death and destruction. Oh, and let's not forget its obvious flow-on: more terrorism.

This was Max Gross for Xenox News, playing his cards, having his beef, smoking Gitanes, drinking Champagne, and reading Sartre.

Vive la France!

Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 23 years ago
    Bush lies about his "humanitarian" justification for invading Iraq. Be aware of the constant references to preserving Iraq's borders... the Iraqi Kurds, Shi-ite Muslims etc may be rid of Saddam thanks to US aggression, but they will not win independence. The greedy Bush regime will make sure of that!
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 23 years ago
    Retired CIA officers are appealing to colleagues still inside to go public with evidence the Bush administration is faking intelligence to support its attack on Iraq.

    They say the administration's public evidence about the immediacy of Iraq's threat to the United States and its alleged ties to al-Qaida does not meet an intelligence professional's standards of proof.

    More: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030314/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_iraq_intelligence_4
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 23 years ago
    Perhaps we can take some comfort in the fact that there probably isn't a government in the world that considers John Howard of any consequence or import.
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 23 years ago
    "To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." - Teddy Roosevelt
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 23 years ago
    White House and congressional sources said Bush intends to send Congress a bill seeking more than $70 billion to pay for the war
    -Zagnut
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 23 years ago
    Feels just like old times! Adolf would be pleased, after all, he invented the "first strike" justification when he invaded Poland. And now that dickless donkey in the White House reckons he can perefect the Fuhrer's blitzkrieg! Better get a lawer, son.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/Print/0,3858,4627219,00.html
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 23 years ago
    The Age reports $168 Billion.
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 23 years ago
    I heard $90 Billion US.... Does that translate into $168 bill Aus?
    Zoot Suit
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 23 years ago
    Ah, good old Johnny, still ducking and dodging, the slimey weasle!
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 23 years ago
    Military support: Gulf War, 1991
    30 coalition forces provided more than 295,000 troops to beef up a US force of 430,000

    Military support: Gulf War, 2003
    30 named "coalition of the willing" members but most are offering only logistic support to the US force of 255,000 troops
    Britain: 45,000 troops
    Australia: 2000 troops
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 23 years ago
    "Do you like cowboys? I like snails"
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 23 years ago
    The most serious issue here (unless you happen to be a fucking Iraqi or Turkish Kurd) is how the US pissed all over the UN processes, sabotaging the agreed-upon weapons inspection program, sidelining Kofi Annan, deriding alternative plans by other national leaders, and ignoring established international laws of engagement.

    Who voted for the Human Shrub to be President of the World?
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 23 years ago
    Time for another bourbon spritzer!
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 23 years ago
    Did someone mention the Iraqi Shi'ite army in Iran to the Shrub? Could be a glitch for the good ol' boys in Washingoon!
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 23 years ago
    How humanitarian is 12 years of devastating economic sanctions that strengthen Saddam's hand but impose misery, suffering and death on Iraqi popuation!
  • This commment is unpublished.
    · 21 years ago
    The Oz Prime Malignancy says that
    shit-eating is very much underrated.
Write comments...
symbols left.
or post as a guest

Latest News

From The Archives