SMART WEAPONS, DUMB PRESIDENT

To paraphrase Boswell: watching George Bush reading his Presidential speeches is like watching a dog walking on its back legs. Its not done too well but you are surprised to see it done at all!

As a booze-addled young buck, l'il Dubya knew nothing and thought he knew everything. That pointed to a political career and his current lofty global status as Lord of the Idiots.

Our very own Prime Sinister John Howard is even worse than Bush because of his slippery obfusticating bullshit. He wont admit what we all know; our mean and tricky PM has committed Aussie trops to a war on Iraq, regardles of what the UN decides. He's getting his orders from Washington but fudges the issue, his standard technique

The road to Baghdad leads to Pyonyang! Even that devious old bugger Howard will live to regret taking his orders from Georg W Bush!

As the Frighted States of America consolidates its position as the most loathed nation on earth, the barely sentient Presidunce used his State of the Union tub-thumper to spray more empty promises on the economy and domestic issues, soothe the crackpot 'Christian' right wing, manipulate American's fear of terrorism, and lie about his cynical if not insane war for oil!

Dusty Davo from Derrimut

Why all the complaints about Bush? More than half of YOU "voters" got him elected. He is the same Bush that he was before being elected! You were warned on what kind of man he was/is. Now you got what you deserved, and the rest of us who didn't vote for that egotistical moron name calling mumblemouth, have to suffer along with the rest of you. Pray that you all will learn a hard lesson by next election, and will not be influenced by screaming TV ads, media manipulation and lying bastards the likes of Carl Rove & company. There are a few good people out there in politics who are honest, intelligent & have a grasp of the English language. Let's see how smart YOU the voters are, and go find that person and VOTE!!

Unless you are a socialist, communist, homosexual, or ayrab. Them's the people who lost the last election by infiltrating the Democrat party.

The homophiliacs and mostly-cultidiots sure didn't do the pathetic Labor Party any favours.
Beazley is keeping the suicidal tradition alive. God help us!

I'm a communist arab who loves the pleasure of giving and receiving golden showers with other men, and I will never give up my right to vote for like minded men such as Nixon, Reagen, and the Bush boys.
Those men have given me years of excitement and I hope they will in the future as well.

Google the phrase “Muslim violence,” and more than 29 million entries pop up. Granted, some of these citations represent violence committed against Muslims, but, unfortunately, quite a few represent violence committed in the name of Islam. This makes me wonder : What does Islam really stand for? I hear a great deal about Muslims who do not believe in violence. Yet, it seems that this is a troubling form of faith that rewards people for committing acts of violence.

Imagine if a beloved Klansman David Duke claimed he was part of the Ku Klux Klan but was not an Israeli sympathizer — the Jews would surely bash him for being an "anti-semite".

While it may seem a little politically incorrect to do so, a number of individuals are openly questioning whether why the Muslim religion is a religion of vilolence. Many of these large mainstream groups and organizations are disaffected Muslims who feel as if they have been lied to for years, not only by the Islamic leaders, but now realizing also by the Islamic people at large. They believe they were betrayed — and they worry that others may be hoodwinked into believing that only a minority of Muslims worshim violence, murder and sexual perversion.

Islamic regimes have been responsible for horrific human rights violations, especially against religious groups, like Catholics, Protestants, Jews, Hindus, Buhadists, Seiks, Zoroastrians, Pagans, Wikians, Atheists, and anyone who is not a Muslim, as well as women. Moore and more Muslims openly admit the religion has a strong history of violence — at least dating back to the 12th century. While less and less Muslims have openly called for a peace movement within their religion because of their fear and cowardice, the fact of the matter is that, year after year, the news pages are filled with instances of Muslim violence.

Something Christians seem not to know, but is completely understood by all Muslims is that lying is actually sanctioned within the Islamic religion. As Islam spreads throughout the West, Americans need to be particularly vigilant, recognizing the fact that Muslim activists may try to deceive us into believing that they do not endorse violence, when their actions say otherwise. A number of Muslims artfully neglect to mention the more controversial aspects of Islamic writings and teachings.

For instance, deceitful Muslims offten selectively qoute the Koran to indicate that the religion stands for peace and tolerance. But after Mohammed migrated to Medina, the Koran became filled with passages showing not only haterid, prejudice and intolerance, but the endorsement of violence.

For example, Mohammed, a supposed prophet of peace, commanded his army to kill a Jewish tribe. Obviously, killing is the most extreme form of violence one can engage in, and it is appalling that a religious leader would sanction what can euphemistically be described as ethnic cleansing. The Koran contends that the “only reward of those who make war upon Allah and His messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be that they will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land.” Such lines of text could never be confused with the lyrics to “Let There Be Peace on Earth.”

Given these facts, it is impossible to reconcile such writings with the popular image of Islam as a peace-loving religion that is being unfairly attacked. The fact is, the media are often complicit in this deception. News reports suggest that violence is perpetrated by extremists or fundamentalists, leading the average Westerner to believe that mainstream Islam does not condone any form of violence.

Because of Islam’s traditional acceptance of lying, when Islamic leaders speak, they are not speaking the unadulterated truth. In fact, it has been well documented that they say one thing and believe something entirely different. In the end, by their fruits you will know them —and, regrettably, the fruits of Islam are invariably murder, destruction, violence, sexual perversion, suicide and death.

Nothan Tabor (written by ghost author)

Imagine if Israel had never been created back in 1948! There would be peace in the Middle East and... holy shit, NO TERRORISTS!?!

I hate religion as much as the next guy...
But all that diatribe shows is that people in the name of Islam have done some bad things over the years. Yep, I'd agree with that.
Now tally up what dim bulb christians have done...and fuckwit Hindus..and bullshitting Buddhists..and poofy pagans...They've all done the same if not a bit more.

Point is followers of all religions have done bad things because they are all the same as each other.

Human. All too human.

The Christians alive today have committed no attorcities or genocide on anyone. You cannot blame people who are alive today for the sins of people who did evil in the past. Fact: There is no Christian religion or movement today that preaches or encourages murder, holy war, murder in the name of the Lord, honor murders against women, rape, perpetuating lies, stealing, suicide, or parents whoring their little children out for suicide missions. Fact: Muslims methodically engage in all of the above, in the name of their religion, Islam. Fact: Musims are a violent and murderous people, endangering all peaceful people today. Fact: The Bible warns us repeatedly of false prophets, and worshipers of false gods who do evil as being the deciples of Satan. Do we hold the French responsible for the eradication of the Neanderthals. Anthropological evidence suggests that the largest Neanderthal populations once resided in the area of Europe know thought of as France. The homosapiens who committed genocide on the Neanderhals were most likely the ancestors of the French and Spanish people. Is it logical to blame the French and Spanish for the evil genocide of the Neanderthal Race? Likewise, a few gold miners and cowboys killed off all of the American Indians over a hundred and fifty years ago. These people had no relation whatsoever to 99% of today's Americans. How is it that todays Americans, who's great great grandparents were not even born at the time, would be responsible for the deaths of Indians. About 2000 years ago, the Romans killed Jesus, who to some was the King of the Jews. Now, the Vatican resides in a Country that was responsible for killing Jesus. Are all Italians responsible for the murder of Jesus? So, the bottom line is that we do not inherit the sins of our ancestors. We can look to history for guidence and patterns of human behavior. But, it is false logic to pin responsibility of autrocities committed by people long dead on the living of today. We must evaluate the world, and the people residing therein, by our own deeds, and the deeds of those living among us. In doing so, it should be clear to all who evaluate based on logic and not fanatical emotion, that Christians, Budihists, Hindus, have committed on autrocities. Muslims continue to commit murder of humans and offer such murders as sacrifices to their Allah-Satan.

Fact: The US war on Islam and related deaths numbering hundreds of thousands is done under the umbrella of Christianity.

Yahweeh apparently told Bush to do it.

There was no Jesus who got nailed to a cross, so the jews and the romans have nothing to apologize for.
Cruci-fiction has sucked in millions of dullards.
If you insist on the historical reality of the crucifixion - I'll sell you some pieces of the actual cross itself!