WELL IT LOOKS LIKE I'LL HAVE TO STAND UP FOR HONEST JOHN...

Raspberry Cordial 01 September 2004 1 minute read

Look you terrorist loving lefties it is pretty simple. John Howard is the Man'o'Steel leader this country needs. And well, sometimes, he has to tell a white lie to protect us. Big deal! Are any of those rickety boats filled with disease ridden refugees hitting our shores any more?
No way!
And he, with his mate the living&loving George Dubya, have got those nasty terrorists on the run!
Whats that socialist nitwit Latham got to offer? Nothing but appeasement for Osama and his mates Muqtada Al Sadr and Yasser Arrafat!

Just remember a vote for Latham is a vote for an Islamic republic in Australia. While a vote for Howard will ensure you can drink beer and watch nekkid chicks doing nasty things to each other!
C'mon Australia I know what you really want...

Raspberry Cordial

Pithy Quote

Conclusionary law not based on now time jurisdiction under rules of evidence are void for one thing. Two, I’ll give you a little secret. Every word that starts in the English language with a vowel, a, e, i, o and u and followed by two consonants is a word that means no contract. If you’re arguing a condition, a negative condition which can’t be proved under a seal which says syntax would be used in its correct format then the technology of writing will be syntaxed accordingly. The words will be identified for their true syntax and the value of that word will be brought to this court so if you have a rule our syntax can tell you exactly what it means frontwards and backwards because the order of operations of syntax are one and the same planet- wide in all five thousand languages, just like as a track multiplying and dividing for the operations of numbers. It is universal communication issues. Closure has to be on the table here for everything under maritime law of commerce because a piece of paper is a vessel in a sea of space and vessels must give closure for their movement between point A and point B and I’m a past master and as a plenipotentiary judge of 75,000 hours of training and 30 years I know how to dissect all this. There hasn’t been anything put in front of me in 30 years that I haven’t been able to dissect to its syntax.